Bin Laden’s Legacy: We Are All Americans, Once Again

postedPosted in Politically Incorrect, Rants, War In Iraq, War On Terrorism on May 3rd, 2011 by glennm

Nearly 10 years ago, days after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, I drove home to the Washington, DC suburbs from Santa Fe, New Mexico. It was a long, long trip, some 28 hours of driving over two and 1/2 days, but an experience like no other.  There was a special sense of community, of shared loss, of egalitarianism and of fraternity that pervaded the highways. Flags and signs hung from overpasses. Everyone listened to the same news alerts.  People made eye contact at rest stops and restaurants, nodding knowingly about the inner rage, and determination, affecting the United States. In many ways, it was a highly spiritual experience and a unique time in this country.

Sunday’s special ops killing in Pakistan of Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden — mastermind, symbol and financial underwriter of the Al Qaeda network — produced much of the same feelings.  Twitter and social media were overwhelmed.  Young people, who have never known a United States without its current national security state apparatus, celebrated in front of the White House.  CNN and the other television news networks served as a place of gathering for Americans of all races, backgrounds and socio-economic status.

Bin Laden’s theory was that Western democracies are weak and thus that direct terrorist attacks would splinter the citizenry and end Western involvement in the Middle East.  He got it entirely backwards. The reality is that 9/11 united the United States. We debate and fight about tactics, long-term strategy and effectiveness, but since that day no American can look at the massive hole of ground zero in Manhattan’s financial district, or the new granite walls of the Pentagon, without recalling where they were and how they felt on 9/11. That’s a legacy that has already outlasted bin Laden.

bin Laden was special ops "double tapped" in the forehead. Guess AK-47 marksmanship training FAILED for that bastard. A fitting end.
@glennm
Glenn Manishin

There’s another way in which bin Laden’s death has once again transformed this country from a nation of strangers to a shared community. This president, whose policies on healthcare, deficit reduction and the like are attacked from all sides, risked everything to get America’s most well-known terrorist enemy. If the operation had failed Obama would have been a crippled leader, like Jimmy Carter after the 1980 Iranian hostage rescue operation faltered in the desert sands, with re-election impossible. His was a balls-out call. For a Democrat, especially, to maintain secret, unilateral “black” intelligence operations in foreign countries has been all but anathema. Obama acted more like Ronald Reagan than either W. or Bush 41 ever did.

John Ullyot, a former Marine intelligence officer who served as a Republican spokesman on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said the operation was “a gutsy call because so much could have gone wrong. The fact that Obama approved this mission instead of the safer option of bombing the compound was the right call militarily, but also a real roll of the dice politically because of how quickly it could have unraveled.”

Obama Finds Praise, Even From Republicans | NYTimes.com.

No one is criticizing the decision to assassinate bin Laden. That in itself is simply amazing, another sign of the feelings of community pervading this country. They will not last, of course. But today we are once again all Americans.

One difference is that although worldwide support for America spiked after 9/11, it seems even Arabs and other Muslims have now largely abandoned the anti-Western Jihad mentality that bin Laden fostered. The revolutions in Egypt, Tunisia, Bahrain and Libya re not being driven by radical Shi’ite imams, rather by middle class tech executives and students.  This year’s Arab Spring movement is secular and largely non-violent. American flags are not being burned and our government — massively out of character historically, and at long last — actually stood on the side of the protesters and against entrenched, repressive Arab governments. That’s another arrow in Al Qaeda’s coffin, and another way in which, in the instantly connected global community of today’s Earth, we really are all Americans.

Bin Laden was adept at convincing smaller, regional terrorist groups that allying with Al Qaeda and focusing on America were the best ways to topple corrupt regimes at home. But many of his supporters grew increasingly distressed by Al Qaeda’s attacks in the last few years — which have killed mostly Muslims — and came to realize that bin Laden had no long-term political program aside from nihilism and death.

The Arab Spring, during which ordinary people in countries like Tunisia and Egypt overthrew their governments, proved that contrary to Al Qaeda’s narrative, hated rulers could be toppled peacefully without attacking America. Indeed, protesters in many cases saw Washington supporting their efforts, further undermining Al Qaeda’s claims.

The End of the Jihadist Dream | NYTimes.com.

Related Posts:

flagTags: , , , ,

Not Too Important

postedPosted in Media Matters, Politically Incorrect, Rants, War In Iraq on June 11th, 2008 by glennm

John McCain said in an interview yesterday that when American troops can return from Iraq is “not too important.” Campaigns Collide Over McCain Remark [NYTimes.com].

This position may not, as the Times reported, be much different from McCain’s explanation of his “100 years” comment, but it is nonetheless revealing. John McCain has morphed from an outspoken maverick to an old man protecting traditional Republican thinking and constituencies —regardless of reality — in the space of a few short years. That’s disappointing and scary, but it is just the start of a long Presidential campaign of negativity of which we are just beginning to see the first glances.

Related Posts:

flagTags: , , , ,

The Greatest Generation

postedPosted in Politically Incorrect, Rants, War In Iraq, War On Terrorism on May 28th, 2008 by glennm

Oh please, there he goes again. Bush Compares Today’s Wars to World War II Efforts [Associated Press]. Once again, President Bush is analogizing between the quagmire of Iraq and the Marshall Plan.

"After World War II we helped Germany and Japan build free societies and strong economies.". . . The result, Bush says, was "generations of security and peace" in the United States. "Today we must do the same in Afghanistan and Iraq," he says in prepared comments [for the U.S. Air Force Academy graduation ceremonies]. "And by helping these young democracies grow in freedom and prosperity we will once again reap the benefits in generations of security and peace."

Ah, W, you seem to forget that those nations were Western, industrialized and had been beaten into "unconditional surrender." Yes, Iraq attacked the Gulf emirates, Iran and the Kurds, but it is hardly the warmongering country Japan was in WWII and certainly nothing like the genocidal psychopaths of Nazi Germany. There is no place in the Islamic Middle East where US-style democracy has taken hold — except perhaps Israel — and the economic structures never existed, and likely never will, to support the middle class which powered the post-war re-emergence of Japan and Germany.

It is not "supporting the troops" to paint then as the vanguard of a democracy army, proselytizing Western values in a land that for 1,000 years has rejected everything Christian and Western. Instead, it’s another lie to obscure the real sacrifices America and its young men are making, for no political or foreign policy reason. The President should be ashamed of himself, but is so myopic he fails to realize this is precisely the Democratic, Wilsonian-style "nation-building" the Republican party, and W himself, have railed against for decades.

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts
flag

Five More Years or 100?

postedPosted in Politically Incorrect, Rants, War In Iraq on May 15th, 2008 by glennm

Well which is it, John?  McCain Believes Iraq War Can be Won by 2013 [AP]. Today McCain declared for the first time he believes the Iraq war can be won by 2013, although he (of course) flatly rejected suggestions that his talk of a timetable put him on the same side as Democrats clamoring for full-scale troop withdrawals.  Nor did he reconcile that prediction with his prior statements that the U.S. may need to be in Iraq for another 100 years.

Even five "short" years is too long to have our young men staying — and dying — in a wasteland desert country that doesn’t want us, doesn’t want democracy and doesn’t serve America’s national interests in any way.  This is just absurd.

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts
flag

Sick to Death

postedPosted in Politically Incorrect, Rants, War In Iraq, War On Terrorism on April 25th, 2008 by glennm

This is just sick. Internal e-mails made public this week as part of a lawsuit in San Francisco federal court show what appears to be the deliberate attempt by top Veterans Administration officials to conceal the number of suicides and attempted suicides by veterans.

In one email message titled “Not for the CBS News…,” the VA’s head of mental health Dr. Ira Katz wrote "Shh!" and then claimed there were 1,000 suicide attempts per month by veterans under the care of the agency.

Meanwhile, the VA was telling Congress and the public that suicide attempts and overall suicides among Gulf and Iraq War veterans are nothing alarming. VA Official Grilled About E-Mails [CBS News].

To my mind, this is one of the biggest acts of hypocrisy imaginable. Almost 25 years ago it was the Agent Orange fiasco.  Today, politicians love to trumpet their "support for the troops," but why is it that no one cares about — and worse, covers up — a plague of suicides after the troops come home? The Bush Administration owes them better than that. America owes them better than that. We all owe them better than that.

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts
flag

Time Warp

postedPosted in War In Iraq on March 19th, 2008 by glennm

I am sorry, didn’t we go through this five years ago with "Mission Accomplished" and all that? Four thousand U.S. deaths and countless more maimed, with the world condemning the U.S. from one end to the other, and Bush still pretends the Iraq invasion was a "success" and the war is "winnable"? President Bush: Iraq War Was Success and Will End in Victory [Times Online]. Time warp indeed. This craziness in Iraq has been a quagmire the whole time, and the irony is that only Donald Rumsfeld — deposed for political reasons in ’06 — ever had the cohones to admit it.

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts
flag

Get Real

postedPosted in Politically Incorrect, Rants, War In Iraq, War On Terrorism on August 31st, 2005 by glennm

It’s late, I’m tired and I just finished watching an incredibly well done and riveting documentary on al Qaeda and 9/11 by National Geographic. And then I read this:

Invoking the spirit of Franklin D. Roosevelt, President Bush on Tuesday cast the war in Iraq as the modern-day moral equivalent of the struggle against Nazi fascism and Japanese imperialism in World War II, arguing that the United States cannot retreat without disastrous consequences.

Bush Calls Iraq War Moral Equivalent Of Allies’ WWII Fight Against the Axis. Of all the gall. Comparing the bunch of rag-tag guerillas that has the U.S. paralyzed in Iraq to the fascists and authoritarians of 1940s Germany, Japan and Italy is sophistry. “The Greatest Generation” knew what they were fighting for and knew it was right. Today, we don’t know who we are fighting and we are “right” only in that we are acting as a pseudo-benevolent occupation force.

Remember that Bush vowed on 9/11 that he would hunt down those responsible and kill them. Osama bin Laden is still out there, and since 9/11 we’ve witnessed Madrid, London and scores of other major al Qaeda terrorist attacks. Meanwhile, Afghanistan is growing more opium than ever before and Iraq has become a new rallying call for Islamic jihad against Western “infidels.”

If Bush had any real courage, he would have nuked Islamabad when he had the chance. But then, throughout American history, it’s been Democrats who fight wars, and Republicans who talk but don’t walk. Get real, George; you cannot make history by wishing this were World War II. It’s a different time, and a different war. The problem is, Iraq is the wrong war. We should be fighting terrorists, but instead we are just sowing the seeds for inevitably more terrorism against all of Western civilization.

Related Posts:

flagTags: , , , ,

The Second Front

postedPosted in War In Iraq, War On Terrorism on May 4th, 2005 by glennm

Now Richard Myers, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, says in a classified report that the U.S. military’s current commitments overseas may prevent it from adequately fighting future conflicts.

Duh! Waging war on two fronts simultaneously has doomed armies from Napoleon to Hitler, so why should the United States be any different? Maybe the neocons running defense policy in the Bush Administration should have thought of this before embarking on the current, nation-building occupation of Iraq. At least Myers is honest. He’s the one who admitted last week that the insurgency in Iraq hasn’t lessened at all in the past year.

Related Posts:

flagTags: , , ,

One Step Forwards, Two Steps Back

postedPosted in Politically Incorrect, War In Iraq, War On Terrorism on April 27th, 2005 by glennm

The insurgency in Iraq is “about where it was a year ago,” in terms of attacks, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said yesterday, but he also asserted that American and Iraqi troops are “gaining ground” in the two-year-old conflict. Yeah, right (not). It was a quagmire two years ago and is worse now. $300 billion and counting (it was only $150 billion last September) and we’re not out yet. “Shock and awe” has been transformed into long lines of flag-draped coffins, pictures suppressed by the military in order to avoid letting the American people know the real price of this occupation.

I am all for spreading democracy and freedom, and am overjoyed that America is finally — after many decades of Machievallian foreign policy — fighting against fascism and tyranny. But in Iraq we’re engaged, pure and simple, in nation-building to protect the human rights of people who bascially either hate or are indifferent to us. Who cares? Let them rot in the desert. We knocked off Saddam Hussein — a very good thing — so let’s get the hell out of there, leave Iraq to the Iraqis, and go after the real “Axis of Evil” in the world. How about Al Qaeda, you morons!!

Related Posts:

flagTags: , ,

The Rules of War In Occupation?

postedPosted in Lawyers, Guns & Money, Politically Incorrect, War In Iraq, War On Terrorism on April 21st, 2005 by glennm

The Department of Defense is prosecuting a Marine Lieutenant, Ilario Pantano, for murder arising out of the shooting death, at an Iraq checkpoint, of two suspected “insurgents.” Allegedly, Pantano ordered other troops to remove the suspects’ handcuffs and look away, and then shot the pair in the back, vandalized their vehicle and hung a sign over their corpses bearing a Marine slogan: “No better friend, no worse enemy.”

Pantano protests that it’s impossible to differentiate between innocent civilians and potential terrorists in the environment of “post-war” Iraq. The problem, here, hoewver, is that both sides are at least partially right. As the 1968 Mi Lai scandal in Vietnam shows, a civilized society must have rules of behavior even in warfare. But the situation in Iraq is poised precariously between war and police-state security. More than 1,700 of our troops have been killed, the majority in car bombs and other “IED” attacks, after “major combat operations” ended in May 2003.

How in hell are these young men supposed to know who the bad guys are? Isn’t this just second-guessing combat decisions made in the fog of war? Genocide is one thing, but in the aftermath of Abu Ghraib, this prosecution strikes me as one making a scapegoat of a solitary solider in order to offer a patina of legitimacy to the atrocious inhumanity of what’s really going on over there.

America decided long ago that we could not be the “world’s policemen.” Now the miltary is doing just that in Iraq. The “rules of engagement” need to be changed, fundamentally, so the troops can defend themselves and do their jobs without being blown up by rag-heads whose idealogy is to kill Westerners, not matter why, just because they are not Muslims. As long as America remains an occupying power in Iraq — which is what we are in reality — this problem will not go away by itself. Even worse, Pantano gave up a lucrative career as a New York investment banker to enlist in the Marines to defend this country. He deserves better thanks than a trumped-up murder prosecution.

Related Posts:

flagTags: