buy excel 2003 software purchase adobe flash cs3 professional buy techtool pro 5 buy acronis true image 2009 home best price office 2008 word 2010 student discount price of windows xp operating system adobe premiere pro price purchase adobe lightroom in nz purchase project 2000 cheap quarkxpress 8 mac buy omnipage professional 17 buy word mac uk discount microsoft office 2003 professional vmware fusion sales
purchase archicad 11 best buy microsoft office outlook 2007 cheap quarkxpress uk price of flash cs4 cost of adobe photoshop cs6 buy ms project online buy photoshop cs4 mac microsoft office 2013 student discount download buy corel videostudio pro x4 buy adobe premiere 5.5 buy office access 2007 upgrade buy outlook 2010 online adobe photoshop cs5 purchase buy flash cs3 online buy autocad lt 2009

Wireless Number Portability is Coming After All

More than seven years after Congress passed the landmark Telecommunications Act of 1996, the federal courts have finally rebuffed efforts by the wireless industry to avoid implementing “local number portability.” In layman’s terrms, this means that consumers can now — or will soon be able to — switch wireless carriers and keep their telephone numbers. The basic argument by CTIA, the cellular industry trade association, was that the industry is too capital-constrained to implement LNP. According to Verizon Wireless, for instance

Requiring local number portability is bad public policy, and the resources required to fulfill this new mandate will unnecessarily be redirected from our core business activities: expanding network quality and reach, improving customer service, and initiating new services and products.

As far as I see it, though, it’s the industry’s own fault, since the price wars on airtime rates and continued subsidies on handsets have led to a cash flow problem of their own creation. More importantly, wireless is increasingly becoming a substitute for wireline POTS (plain old telephone service). So since wireline carriers have been required to provide LNP for years, there is no policy justification for exempting wireless carriers, especially since they want to compete for that same business. That’s what the FCC ruled, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit agreed. Common sense prevails. An unusual, but highly satisfying, legal outcome.

Related Posts:

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments are closed.