buy rosetta stone hindi used buy acronis disk director buy microsoft powerpoint 2007 product key buy revit mep discount rosetta stone english buy money 2008 deluxe cheapest office 2007 pro windows xp home oem key buy publisher online buy windows 7 home premium 64 bit discount photoshop elements discount viveza discount office 2003 software buy microsoft word online buy wavelab 6 discount windows xp 64 buy after effects cs4 from adobe com cheap quicken home business buy 2010 outlook buy autodesk 3ds max 2010 software buy project professional 2010 buy quarkxpress online buy windows 7 oem 64 bit cost of microsoft outlook 2010 cheap windows 2003 enterprise adobe photoshop cs4 cheapest buying office 2010 cheap buying microsoft office 2013 mac discount data rescue 3 purchase photoshop 6

Wireless Number Portability is Coming After All

More than seven years after Congress passed the landmark Telecommunications Act of 1996, the federal courts have finally rebuffed efforts by the wireless industry to avoid implementing “local number portability.” In layman’s terrms, this means that consumers can now — or will soon be able to — switch wireless carriers and keep their telephone numbers. The basic argument by CTIA, the cellular industry trade association, was that the industry is too capital-constrained to implement LNP. According to Verizon Wireless, for instance

Requiring local number portability is bad public policy, and the resources required to fulfill this new mandate will unnecessarily be redirected from our core business activities: expanding network quality and reach, improving customer service, and initiating new services and products.

As far as I see it, though, it’s the industry’s own fault, since the price wars on airtime rates and continued subsidies on handsets have led to a cash flow problem of their own creation. More importantly, wireless is increasingly becoming a substitute for wireline POTS (plain old telephone service). So since wireline carriers have been required to provide LNP for years, there is no policy justification for exempting wireless carriers, especially since they want to compete for that same business. That’s what the FCC ruled, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit agreed. Common sense prevails. An unusual, but highly satisfying, legal outcome.

Related Posts:

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments are closed.