The Torture Apologists

postedPosted in Politically Incorrect, War On Terrorism on May 5th, 2011 by glennm

rotinhell

Everyone is walking back the cat on this issue. Waterboarding yielded nothing related to the courier who ultimately led to bin Laden’s Pakistan compound. That doesn’t prove torture was useless from an intelligence standpoint, but Abu Ghraib and Gitmo certainly didn’t produce “actionable intelligence” on bin Laden’s location, or else W and company could have tracked him down many years ago.

As I’ve noted earlier, it’s “hard to believe that for nearly a decade after 9-11, the United States was still not been able to find a 7-foot Arab in Pakistan hooked up to a dialysis machine!”

John Yoo, the former Bush Justice Department lawyer who twisted the Constitution and the Geneva Conventions into an unrecognizable mess to excuse torture, wrote in The Wall Street Journal that the killing of Bin Laden proved that waterboarding and other abuses were proper. Donald Rumsfeld, the former defense secretary, said at first that no coerced evidence played a role in tracking down Bin Laden, but by Tuesday he was reciting the talking points about the virtues of prisoner abuse.

The chair of the U.S. Senate’s intelligence committee countered that “enhanced interrogation” did not help the bin Laden operation in any way.

More and more evidence suggests a key piece of intelligence — the first link in the chain of information that led U.S. intelligence officials to Osama bin Laden — wasn’t tortured out of its source. And, indeed, that torture actually failed to produce it.

Senate Intel Chair: Torture Did Not Lead To Bin Laden In Any Way | TPMDC.

Related Posts:

flagTags: , , ,

Bin Laden’s Legacy: We Are All Americans, Once Again

postedPosted in Politically Incorrect, Rants, War In Iraq, War On Terrorism on May 3rd, 2011 by glennm

Nearly 10 years ago, days after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, I drove home to the Washington, DC suburbs from Santa Fe, New Mexico. It was a long, long trip, some 28 hours of driving over two and 1/2 days, but an experience like no other.  There was a special sense of community, of shared loss, of egalitarianism and of fraternity that pervaded the highways. Flags and signs hung from overpasses. Everyone listened to the same news alerts.  People made eye contact at rest stops and restaurants, nodding knowingly about the inner rage, and determination, affecting the United States. In many ways, it was a highly spiritual experience and a unique time in this country.

Sunday’s special ops killing in Pakistan of Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden — mastermind, symbol and financial underwriter of the Al Qaeda network — produced much of the same feelings.  Twitter and social media were overwhelmed.  Young people, who have never known a United States without its current national security state apparatus, celebrated in front of the White House.  CNN and the other television news networks served as a place of gathering for Americans of all races, backgrounds and socio-economic status.

Bin Laden’s theory was that Western democracies are weak and thus that direct terrorist attacks would splinter the citizenry and end Western involvement in the Middle East.  He got it entirely backwards. The reality is that 9/11 united the United States. We debate and fight about tactics, long-term strategy and effectiveness, but since that day no American can look at the massive hole of ground zero in Manhattan’s financial district, or the new granite walls of the Pentagon, without recalling where they were and how they felt on 9/11. That’s a legacy that has already outlasted bin Laden.

bin Laden was special ops "double tapped" in the forehead. Guess AK-47 marksmanship training FAILED for that bastard. A fitting end.
@glennm
Glenn Manishin

There’s another way in which bin Laden’s death has once again transformed this country from a nation of strangers to a shared community. This president, whose policies on healthcare, deficit reduction and the like are attacked from all sides, risked everything to get America’s most well-known terrorist enemy. If the operation had failed Obama would have been a crippled leader, like Jimmy Carter after the 1980 Iranian hostage rescue operation faltered in the desert sands, with re-election impossible. His was a balls-out call. For a Democrat, especially, to maintain secret, unilateral “black” intelligence operations in foreign countries has been all but anathema. Obama acted more like Ronald Reagan than either W. or Bush 41 ever did.

John Ullyot, a former Marine intelligence officer who served as a Republican spokesman on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said the operation was “a gutsy call because so much could have gone wrong. The fact that Obama approved this mission instead of the safer option of bombing the compound was the right call militarily, but also a real roll of the dice politically because of how quickly it could have unraveled.”

Obama Finds Praise, Even From Republicans | NYTimes.com.

No one is criticizing the decision to assassinate bin Laden. That in itself is simply amazing, another sign of the feelings of community pervading this country. They will not last, of course. But today we are once again all Americans.

One difference is that although worldwide support for America spiked after 9/11, it seems even Arabs and other Muslims have now largely abandoned the anti-Western Jihad mentality that bin Laden fostered. The revolutions in Egypt, Tunisia, Bahrain and Libya re not being driven by radical Shi’ite imams, rather by middle class tech executives and students.  This year’s Arab Spring movement is secular and largely non-violent. American flags are not being burned and our government — massively out of character historically, and at long last — actually stood on the side of the protesters and against entrenched, repressive Arab governments. That’s another arrow in Al Qaeda’s coffin, and another way in which, in the instantly connected global community of today’s Earth, we really are all Americans.

Bin Laden was adept at convincing smaller, regional terrorist groups that allying with Al Qaeda and focusing on America were the best ways to topple corrupt regimes at home. But many of his supporters grew increasingly distressed by Al Qaeda’s attacks in the last few years — which have killed mostly Muslims — and came to realize that bin Laden had no long-term political program aside from nihilism and death.

The Arab Spring, during which ordinary people in countries like Tunisia and Egypt overthrew their governments, proved that contrary to Al Qaeda’s narrative, hated rulers could be toppled peacefully without attacking America. Indeed, protesters in many cases saw Washington supporting their efforts, further undermining Al Qaeda’s claims.

The End of the Jihadist Dream | NYTimes.com.

Related Posts:

flagTags: , , , ,

House Restricts Air Travel “Virtual Strip-Search” Technologies

postedPosted in Lawyers, Guns & Money, Travel, War On Terrorism on June 6th, 2009 by glennm

Yesterday the U.S. House of Representatives voted to restrict TSA from conducting what have become known as “virtual strip-searches.”  House Restricts “Strip-Search Machines” [WashingtonWatch.com].  The bill provides, among other things, that:

Whole-body imaging technology may not be used as the sole or primary method of screening a passenger under this section. Whole-body imaging technology may not be used to screen a passenger under this section unless another method of screening, such as metal detection, demonstrates cause for preventing such passenger from boarding an aircraft.

Virtual Strip Search Image with Privacy Filter

Virtual Strip Search "Privacy Filter"

Although promoted as less intrusive than x-rays, explosive sniffers and the like, this new technology presents a significant threat to personal privacy.  As the sponsor (Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah) said, “Nobody needs to see my wife and kids naked to secure an airplane.”  My colleague Chris Calabrese of the ACLU makes it graphically clear:

these machines produce strikingly graphic images of passengers’ bodies when they are utilized as part of the airport screening process. Those images reveal not just graphic images of “naughty parts,” but also intimate medical details like colostomy bags.

Privacy advocacy groups are, for obvious reasons, alarmed.  It is very much like the “Tunnel of Truth” hypothesized in the 1990 sci-fi film Total Recall. That was scary indeed! Not unsurprisingly, on May 31, a coalition of advocacy groups including the ACLU, the Electronic Privacy Information Center, Gun Owners of America, and the Consumer Federation of America sent a letter to Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano asking her to “suspend the program until the privacy and security risks are fully evaluated.”

That will never happen. It its zeal to “protect” Americans traveling by air, TSA has turned the check-in experience into the U.S. equivalent of the Star Chamber, where ordinary citizens are presumed to be dangerous just by, for instance, wearing shoes — now routinely x-rayed separately at every U.S. airport — or putting liquids into carry-on luggage.  The millimeter wave and related strip-search technologies ratchet this up yet another level.  Use of a “privacy screen” to cover intimate areas is hardly an answer.

Tunnel of Truth (1990)

Tunnel of Truth (1990)

In my view, TSA is out of control.  Yes, there were security lapses leading to 9/11, but they did not arise from business or vacation travelers and, with a bit more diligence (like following up on middle eastern males taking flying lessons but rejecting landing practice) the government could target those likeliest to have real terrorist connections.  Just as TSA’s “no fly list” was overreaching, so is virtual body searching.  We do not need this and we do not need TSA.  I say abolish the agency, something with which Jim Harper of the Cato Institute, the premiere libertarian think tank, agrees.

Related Posts:

flagTags: , , , ,

Black Ops Are Good

postedPosted in War On Terrorism on November 10th, 2008 by glennm

Nothing wrong with this at all. Secret Order Lets U.S. Raid Al Qaeda in Many Countries [NYTimes.com]. You can’t have public orders for special operations, certainly not against a foe as determined and resourceful as Al Qaeda. Now if only W and the neo-cons could actually have gotten something done. Hard to believe that more than seven years after 9-11 the United States has still not been able to find a 7-foot Arab in Pakistan hooked up to a dialysis machine!

Related Posts:

flagTags: , , , , ,

Blaming the Dead

postedPosted in Lawyers, Guns & Money, Politically Incorrect, Rants, War On Terrorism on August 17th, 2008 by glennm

I almost forgot about this little FBI fiasco from last week. Seems as if, seven years later, our wonderous federal forensic cops finally fingered the culprit in those Anthrax mail attacks against the Senate. Problem is, the perp committed suicide weeks ago. So the FBI’a “case” basically amounts to assertions that Bruce Ivins, a scientist with access to anthrax samples, could not “credibly” explain an alibi. F.B.I. Details Anthrax Case, but Doubts Remain [NYTimes.com].

No shit, “doubts” remain. Remember Richard Jewell from Atlanta, hounded mercilessly after being accused of the ’96 Olympic bombings? He nearly bought the farm and was clearly innocent. The FBI’s disclaimer that “the many mysteries of the case meant an air of uncertainty would always surround it” is too little, too late. If American law enforcement can only solve cases years later by blaming dead guys, we as a society have mucho problemas.

Related Posts:

flagTags: , , , ,

Only In the Movies

postedPosted in Pop Art, Stuff, Tech Bytes on April 18th, 2008 by glennm

Totalrecall_xray

One of the best scenes in Arnold Schwarzenegger’s film Total Recall is when he goes through a security checkpoint that has invisible, futuristic x-ray scanners which can see weapons and other things beneath one’s clothing. That movie dates from 1990, but now it turns out that the technology is real. New Body Scans at Airport Security See Through Clothes [Switched.com]. The concept is called millimeter wave scanning and it is described by TSA as producing images that “are friendly enough to post in a preschool. Heck, it could even make the cover of Reader’s Digest and not offend anybody.” I think I like the movie version better anyway!

If things have gone wrong, I’m talking to myself, and you’ve probably got a wet towel wrapped around your head. So whatever your name is, get ready for a big surprise: YOU are not YOU, You are ME.

Related Posts:

flagTags: , , ,

Get Real

postedPosted in Politically Incorrect, Rants, War In Iraq, War On Terrorism on August 31st, 2005 by glennm

It’s late, I’m tired and I just finished watching an incredibly well done and riveting documentary on al Qaeda and 9/11 by National Geographic. And then I read this:

Invoking the spirit of Franklin D. Roosevelt, President Bush on Tuesday cast the war in Iraq as the modern-day moral equivalent of the struggle against Nazi fascism and Japanese imperialism in World War II, arguing that the United States cannot retreat without disastrous consequences.

Bush Calls Iraq War Moral Equivalent Of Allies’ WWII Fight Against the Axis. Of all the gall. Comparing the bunch of rag-tag guerillas that has the U.S. paralyzed in Iraq to the fascists and authoritarians of 1940s Germany, Japan and Italy is sophistry. “The Greatest Generation” knew what they were fighting for and knew it was right. Today, we don’t know who we are fighting and we are “right” only in that we are acting as a pseudo-benevolent occupation force.

Remember that Bush vowed on 9/11 that he would hunt down those responsible and kill them. Osama bin Laden is still out there, and since 9/11 we’ve witnessed Madrid, London and scores of other major al Qaeda terrorist attacks. Meanwhile, Afghanistan is growing more opium than ever before and Iraq has become a new rallying call for Islamic jihad against Western “infidels.”

If Bush had any real courage, he would have nuked Islamabad when he had the chance. But then, throughout American history, it’s been Democrats who fight wars, and Republicans who talk but don’t walk. Get real, George; you cannot make history by wishing this were World War II. It’s a different time, and a different war. The problem is, Iraq is the wrong war. We should be fighting terrorists, but instead we are just sowing the seeds for inevitably more terrorism against all of Western civilization.

Related Posts:

flagTags: , , , ,

The Second Front

postedPosted in War In Iraq, War On Terrorism on May 4th, 2005 by glennm

Now Richard Myers, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, says in a classified report that the U.S. military’s current commitments overseas may prevent it from adequately fighting future conflicts.

Duh! Waging war on two fronts simultaneously has doomed armies from Napoleon to Hitler, so why should the United States be any different? Maybe the neocons running defense policy in the Bush Administration should have thought of this before embarking on the current, nation-building occupation of Iraq. At least Myers is honest. He’s the one who admitted last week that the insurgency in Iraq hasn’t lessened at all in the past year.

Related Posts:

flagTags: , , ,

A Trial For Osama

postedPosted in Media Matters, Politically Incorrect, Rants, War In Iraq, War On Terrorism on January 9th, 2004 by glennm

Conservatives have had a great time the past month lambasting Howard Dean for suggesting that Osama bin Laden, if captured, should be put on trial and that his guilt should not be presumed. Well, just so happens that President Bush himself said the same thing — about the tyrant Saddam Hussein — in a December 15 news conference:

QUESTION: Mr. President, you said earlier this morning that in a trial that all of Saddam’s atrocities need to be brought out. He was in power more than 30 years. It probably would make for a long rap sheet.

You’re not supposed to pre-judge.

QUESTION: Yes. I’m just counting the years.

OK, good.

QUESTION: Do you believe that the invasion of Kuwait in 1990 should be included, as well as his assassination attempt against former President Bush?

So, where is the conservative anger when their own man makes the same “slip”? And why has the media not picked up on this, despite the Republican insistence that the media are a bunch of flaming, Democratic-leftie liberals?

That’ll all be decided by the lawyers. And I will instruct this government to make sure the system includes the Iraqi citizens and make sure the process withstands international scrutiny. But we’ll let the lawyers handle all that. And, as you know, I’m not a lawyer. And I delegate. And I’m going to delegate this to the legal community which will be reviewing all of this matter.

Related Posts:

flagTags: , , , , ,

Now They’re Targeting Muslims

postedPosted in War On Terrorism on November 11th, 2003 by glennm

Yesterday’s Al Queda bombings in Saudi Arabia signal a “new tactic,” according to CNN. Sure do. Osama bin Laden is now going after Muslims instead of Americans and other Westerners. It’s about time. It also signals that these fanatics don’t care who they kill or why anyone should die in their obsession with Islamic purity. I’m all for tolerance, but there’s no way to tolerate this kind of inhumane obliviousness to the value of human life. Let them all blow each other up!

Related Posts:

flagTags: , , ,